Dr. Andreas Hoff
Consultant for workplace working time systems
Arbeitszeitsysteme

Dr. Andreas Hoff is a working time and workforce management specialist and the founder of arbeitszeitsysteme.com.

He is considered one of the leading experts for flexible shift scheduling in the German-speaking region.

Discover how you can make your planning even smarter.

Talk to our team of experts for a personalised potential assessment.

Predictability in Shift Work: Intelligent Models for Reliable Free Time

Why is the desire for predictability a challenge for workforce scheduling? 

Employees in shift work increasingly demand a high degree of predictability, often as a necessary counterweight to the lower working time quality compared to day shifts. Flexible systems that involve rolling weekly schedules therefore often meet with skepticism – mandatory additional shifts on what should be days off are particularly unpopular. This creates a dilemma for companies: A rigid schedule quickly leads to understaffing in the event of fluctuations in personnel availability (e.g., due to illness), which is hardly justifiable economically or in terms of workload. The solution lies in systems that map the standard working time exactly and integrate absences in a forward-looking manner.

How do multiple staffing systems enable a rigid yet perfectly fitting shift plan? 

In order to precisely achieve the contractual working time (e.g., 37.5 h/week) in continuous shift operations, simple 4- or 5-shift systems are often insufficient, as they produce either too many or too few hours. Multiple staffing systems offer a solution here, in which operating shifts are staffed by several teams or sub-teams:

  • 9:2 System: Nine teams staff the shifts in such a way that two teams are always present at the same time. This enables a stable 9-week cycle and minimizes required workplace changes.
  • 4x9:8 System: In a 4-shift system, the teams are each divided into nine sub-teams, of which eight are always scheduled to be on duty. This generates regular free shifts firmly anchored in the schedule and is particularly suitable for large workforces.

Is annual planning the key to reliable deployment schedules? 

A viable compromise between flexibility and reliability is year-round predictability. Here, employees are given a binding personal deployment plan after vacation planning is completed – ideally by mid-December for the entire following year. The basis is usually a 5-shift system, in which contractually agreed extra shifts are specifically scheduled for vacation replacement. Through this process, fluctuating personnel availability is smoothed out without short-term schedule changes burdening the everyday lives of the employees.

How can short-term deviations be organized without losing control? 

Despite long-term planning, operational deviations remain unavoidable. These can either be managed classically via working time accounts or solved within the framework of self-organization and trust-based working time. A "tit-for-tat" compensation, where employees swap shifts with each other or directly compensate for leaving early with later extra work within the team, ensures that the shift plan always works out. Modern software solutions with integrated swap boards support this process and promote the personal responsibility of the teams.

Conclusion: Why is forward-looking planning the best way? 

Complete predictability is not a utopia, but the result of methodical design. Whether through multiple staffing or consistent annual planning in a 5-shift system – the key lies in the decoupling of operating time and individual working time. Such models reduce planning stress for everyone involved and ensure the long-term satisfaction and health of the workforce.

Read the full expert article by Dr. Andreas Hoff on "What to do when shift employees want complete predictability?" on arbeitszeitsysteme.com.